top of page

What is the difference between ChatGPT-4 and ChatGPT-4o? A comprehensive guide

With the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, various models have emerged that are revolutionising the way we interact with technology. One of the latest and most significant models is ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI. In particular, the ChatGPT-4 and ChatGPT-4o versions have attracted considerable attention. But what exactly is the difference between these two versions? In this article, we shed light on the main differences and the respective application possibilities.


ChatGPT-4: The evolution of conversational AI


ChatGPT-4 is the fourth generation of OpenAI's generative pre-trained transformer model. It builds on the success of its predecessors and brings numerous improvements:


  1. Increased accuracy: ChatGPT-4 offers significantly improved accuracy in natural language processing. It can better understand complex requests and provide more relevant answers.

  2. Enhanced context: Thanks to improved context processing, ChatGPT-4 can have longer and more coherent conversations, resulting in a more natural interaction.

  3. Broader knowledge base: With an updated database and additional training data, ChatGPT-4 is able to access a wider range of topics and provide more detailed answers.

  4. Improved security: OpenAI has implemented enhanced security measures in ChatGPT-4 to minimise potentially harmful or unethical responses.


Chatgpt-4o: Optimised performance for specific tasks


ChatGPT-4o, where the "o" stands for "optimised", is a specialised version of ChatGPT-4. This variant is designed to handle specific tasks more efficiently and therefore offers a number of differences and advantages:


  1. Task-specific optimisation: ChatGPT-4o is optimised for specific applications and tasks, e.g. customer service, technical support or content creation. This customisation enables a faster and more accurate response to recurring requests.

  2. Resource efficiency: Thanks to the optimisation, ChatGPT-4o requires less computing power and can therefore be operated more cost-effectively. This is particularly beneficial for organisations looking to deploy AI solutions on a large scale.

  3. Customised training data: Unlike ChatGPT-4, which is trained on a general database, ChatGPT-4o is trained with specific datasets that are customised to the application in question. This further increases the relevance and accuracy of the responses.

  4. Faster response times: The specialised nature of ChatGPT-4o enables faster response times as the model has to search through less data to find relevant information.


Comparison and possible applications


To better understand the differences between ChatGPT-4 and ChatGPT-4o, it is worth making a direct comparison:


General Application vs Specific Application: While ChatGPT-4 serves as a general-purpose AI model, ChatGPT-4o is optimised for specific applications. Companies that need to process a wide range of requests are more likely to benefit from ChatGPT-4, while ChatGPT-4o is more efficient for specialised tasks.


Cost and resources: ChatGPT-4o is more resource efficient and less expensive to operate, making it the ideal choice for organisations that need to be budget conscious.


Performance: Both models offer high performance, but ChatGPT-4o shines in its specific application area with faster and more accurate responses.


Hier ist ein gutes Video von CNET über ChatGPT4o:




You can watch the whole event here:





ChatGPT-4 and ChatGPT-4o are impressive models that cover different needs. While ChatGPT-4 impresses with its versatility and extensive knowledge base, ChatGPT-4o offers a more efficient solution for specialised applications thanks to its optimisation for specific tasks. Companies should choose the right model depending on their individual requirements in order to achieve the best results.


WebHub360 recommends always keeping specific requirements and goals in mind when implementing AI solutions in order to realise the full potential of these advanced technologies.


Commenti


bottom of page